Re: [GENERAL] Re: "LockRelease: locktable lookup failed, no lock"

From: Wim Aarts <w(dot)aarts(at)dsdeurne(dot)nl>
To: Steve Wolfe <steve(at)iboats(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: "LockRelease: locktable lookup failed, no lock"
Date: 2000-03-02 07:34:21
Message-ID: 38BE197D.C6300610@dsdeurne.nl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi Steve,

Have you checked for inserts in the message field larger then 8k?

Cheers Wim.

Steve Wolfe wrote:

> Grr....
>
> Although I'm no longer getting lock releases on this table, a daily
> vaccum analyze still shows:
>
> NOTICE: Rel reef: Uninitialized page 492 - fixing
> NOTICE: Rel reef: Uninitialized page 498 - fixing
> NOTICE: Rel reef: Uninitialized page 499 - fixing
>
> The database is a fledgling mail archive, when a message comes in, a
> program parses the message for the relevant information, inserts it into
> the table, and it's done. Since it's in very early development, there are
> only very occasional queries on it. Here's the schema that I used to
> create the table....
>
> create sequence reef_sequence increment 2;
>
> create table reef(
> reef_index int4 default nextval('reef_sequence') primary
> key,
> subject varchar(256),
> author varchar(256),
> author_email varchar(256),
> message text,
> date date,
> time time,
> is_reply int
> );
>
> Now I know that there are problems with that, like "is_reply" should be a
> bool, not an int. This is a very old project that I'm just starting up
> again... go easy on me. : )
>
> steve
>
> ************

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jesse Scott 2000-03-02 07:51:14 Postgres on MacOS... Is it even a possibility?
Previous Message Stan Jacobs 2000-03-02 07:12:36 Simple problem?