Re: [HACKERS] bitten by docs

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] bitten by docs
Date: 2000-03-02 06:46:47
Message-ID: 38BE0E57.107D1FC3@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> This was discussed a while ago. I thought we had agreed that we needed
> to keep two sets of docs on the website, one for the last stable release
> (ie, 6.5 currently) and one for the current development tip. But I
> guess nothing's been done about it yet...

Perhaps we agreed what should be done, but I'm not sure anyone agreed
to actually do it.

Vince, could you take ownership of this issue (at least to get it on a
ToDo list so we don't forget)? I'm happy to help (will probably need
to redirect the nightly html production to another area of the web
site) but I'm reluctant to muck around with the overall structure of
the site, at least without some adult supervision...

- Thomas

--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-03-02 06:48:07 Re: [HACKERS] bitten by docs
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-03-02 06:29:10 Re: BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST)