Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "'pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-sql(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh
Date: 2000-03-01 06:46:28
Message-ID: 38BCBCC4.341E1BB8@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql

> As of an hour ago, neither one is a reserved word ;-)

Darn, I was just warming up to a good argument :))

- Thomas

--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-03-01 06:50:45 Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-03-01 06:29:25 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Colin Rothnie 2000-03-01 07:18:49 Newbie question: syntax for using Foreign Key
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-03-01 06:29:25 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh