| From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "'pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-sql(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh |
| Date: | 2000-03-01 06:14:51 |
| Message-ID: | 38BCB55B.AC175BB9@alumni.caltech.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
> So are we willing to field questions from people trying to use TEMP
> tables and trying TEMP and not TEMPORARY. I realize the restriction on
> a field called TEMP, but we don't get those very often. How many people
> are going to guess TEMP and not TEMPORARY?
Well, that's one reason to stick to a published standard. No guessing
required since one could look it up ;)
- Thomas
--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-03-01 06:18:41 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh |
| Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2000-03-01 05:56:43 | RE: [HACKERS] Bug report for 7.0beta1 in 'CREATE FUNCTION...' |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-03-01 06:18:41 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh |
| Previous Message | Christopher Sawtell | 2000-03-01 03:26:24 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh |