From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
Cc: | hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: copyObject: don't know how to copy 1381319466 |
Date: | 2000-02-16 03:09:27 |
Message-ID: | 38AA14E7.310C2FB1@alumni.caltech.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > Do I need initdb ? postamster started normally
> Probably --- I recall Thomas muttering yesterday that he needed an
> initdb himself. FWIW, I got fairly clean regress results from a
> CVS pull of about 1AM (6AM GMT) this morning ... but I did initdb.
Sorry, yes, and I should have announce it.
> No catversion.h update to force initdb though. Naughty naughty,
> Thomas...
Oops. And I should have known, having been stopped dead in the water
once or twice in the last few weeks resyncing from CVS and finding
that my work in progress required an initdb due to other changes. Oh,
and finding that my parser was so broken that initdb wouldn't run. Fun
fun fun ;)
Anyway, istm to be a mixed blessing during pre-beta, but I didn't
intentionally subvert it...
- Thomas
--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ed Loehr | 2000-02-16 04:05:24 | vnunet.com Inprise/Borland spins off Interbase database as separate company |
Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2000-02-16 03:05:59 | Re: [HACKERS] Release on the 15th? |