Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: copyObject: don't know how to copy 1381319466

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: copyObject: don't know how to copy 1381319466
Date: 2000-02-16 03:09:27
Message-ID: 38AA14E7.310C2FB1@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > Do I need initdb ? postamster started normally
> Probably --- I recall Thomas muttering yesterday that he needed an
> initdb himself. FWIW, I got fairly clean regress results from a
> CVS pull of about 1AM (6AM GMT) this morning ... but I did initdb.

Sorry, yes, and I should have announce it.

> No catversion.h update to force initdb though. Naughty naughty,
> Thomas...

Oops. And I should have known, having been stopped dead in the water
once or twice in the last few weeks resyncing from CVS and finding
that my work in progress required an initdb due to other changes. Oh,
and finding that my parser was so broken that initdb wouldn't run. Fun
fun fun ;)

Anyway, istm to be a mixed blessing during pre-beta, but I didn't
intentionally subvert it...

- Thomas

--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ed Loehr 2000-02-16 04:05:24 vnunet.com Inprise/Borland spins off Interbase database as separate company
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-02-16 03:05:59 Re: [HACKERS] Release on the 15th?