From: | Sevo Stille <sevo(at)ip23(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] function question yet again |
Date: | 2000-02-15 14:14:57 |
Message-ID: | 38A95F61.701B458C@ip23.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Meskes wrote:
>
> Is it possible to define a function in language 'C' that needs more
> libraries to work? I've got a small example of a function that works like a
> charm when run against from a binary. However if I put this function inside
> the server and execute it I get
>
> ERROR: parser: parse error at or near ""
>
> Not exactly an error message that explains itself. :-)
Actually, it is very suggestive of quoting or escaping errors.
Presumably your statement terminates somewhere where you would not
expect it.
> I have put my function into a shared library to load it, but the library
> itself needs other libraries. Is this at all possible?
If the system knows how to find it, absolutely. That is, whatever you
depend on will have to be in a system or pgsql library directory.
Sevo
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Meskes | 2000-02-15 14:24:30 | Re: [HACKERS] function question yet again |
Previous Message | Michael Meskes | 2000-02-15 14:13:26 | Re: [HACKERS] function defined in libpq? |