Re: [HACKERS] function defined in libpq?

From: Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] function defined in libpq?
Date: 2000-02-15 08:45:44
Message-ID: 38A91238.1258AB43@mascari.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> On Tue, 15 Feb 2000, Mike Mascari wrote:
>
> > > On Mon, 14 Feb 2000, Michael Meskes wrote:
> > >
> > > > Could anyone please give me an example on how I can define a function using
> > > > libpq if that is at all possible?
>
> > I think what he wants to do is dynamically create a function from the client
> > side by issuing a CREATE FUNCTION statement (presumably one of the built-ins?
> > SQL, pl/pgSQL, pl/pgTcl.) For what its worth, I've issued a host of unlreated
> > DDL statements through PQexec and all of them have worked as expected, although
> > CREATE FUNCTION was never one of them...
>
> Why wouldn't it work? Or, much more interesting, how else would you do it?
>
>

Yes. Sorry. Stupid answer on my part. psql is so nice, particularly the new one :-),
that I keep forgetting it is dependent entirely upon libpq....

Mike Mascari

>
> Peter Eisentraut Sernanders vaeg 10:115
> peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
> http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kardos, Dr. Andreas 2000-02-15 09:02:52 Re: [HACKERS] README.qnx4 -> FAQ_QNX4
Previous Message Mike Mascari 2000-02-15 08:42:33 Re: [HACKERS] function question yet again