Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation

From: Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation
Date: 2000-02-14 05:47:29
Message-ID: 38A796F1.2D2EDBA1@nimrod.itg.telecom.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


BTW, in the absense of an ORDER BY clause, doesn't offset totally
lose its meaning? If you're going to do this optimisation,
you may as well ignore offset entirely in this case.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-02-14 06:32:33 Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation
Previous Message Philip Warner 2000-02-14 05:41:23 Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation