Re: [HACKERS] ONLY

From: Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au>
To:
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] ONLY
Date: 2000-02-07 23:56:39
Message-ID: 389F5BB7.9B7C3EEC@nimrod.itg.telecom.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> >*sigh* I hate it when people do this. YOU try writing a standard with that
> >much information such that nobody will come back to you and say "you left
> >such-and-such undefined".

Like someone else said, if they at least supplied a compilable gram.y
we'd
at least have a definitive syntax, and could restrain ourselves to
arguing
about the meanings.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-02-08 00:02:19 Re: [HACKERS] TODO item
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-02-07 23:48:28 Re: [HACKERS] New Globe