From: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 7 RPMs coming soon |
Date: | 2000-02-07 23:15:28 |
Message-ID: | 389F520F.C114611E@wgcr.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > database, in an FHS-compliant manner (the current regression tests AND
> > upgrade scripts are not in compliance with the FHS in terms of their
[snip]
> What exactly is FHS and what do they say? I am vaguely phantasizing about
> doing a little work on the build process for the next release; is that
> something that could be addressed?
FHS 2.0 is the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard, successor to the Linux
FileSystem Standard (FSSTND). You may find the full document at
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/
Currently, in order to get PostgreSQL into RPM form requires a number of
mungifications -- the current prefix parameter is set to /usr, which
puts binaries and shared libs in the right place -- but everything else
is moved into place manually. It is a rather kludgy build script (ask
Thomas, he knows). To look at the build script (in RPM parlance, a
'spec file'), load up
http://www.ramifordistat.net/postgres/unpacked/non-beta/postgresql-6.5.3-3.spec
(one line; it'll probably wrap on your e-mail client).
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-02-07 23:16:49 | Re: [HACKERS] TODO item |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-02-07 23:13:01 | Re: [HACKERS] Longer Column Names |