Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 7 RPMs coming soon

From: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 7 RPMs coming soon
Date: 2000-02-07 23:15:28
Message-ID: 389F520F.C114611E@wgcr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > database, in an FHS-compliant manner (the current regression tests AND
> > upgrade scripts are not in compliance with the FHS in terms of their
[snip]

> What exactly is FHS and what do they say? I am vaguely phantasizing about
> doing a little work on the build process for the next release; is that
> something that could be addressed?

FHS 2.0 is the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard, successor to the Linux
FileSystem Standard (FSSTND). You may find the full document at
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/

Currently, in order to get PostgreSQL into RPM form requires a number of
mungifications -- the current prefix parameter is set to /usr, which
puts binaries and shared libs in the right place -- but everything else
is moved into place manually. It is a rather kludgy build script (ask
Thomas, he knows). To look at the build script (in RPM parlance, a
'spec file'), load up
http://www.ramifordistat.net/postgres/unpacked/non-beta/postgresql-6.5.3-3.spec
(one line; it'll probably wrap on your e-mail client).

--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-02-07 23:16:49 Re: [HACKERS] TODO item
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-02-07 23:13:01 Re: [HACKERS] Longer Column Names