Re: [HACKERS] ONLY

From: Chris <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com>
To: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] ONLY
Date: 2000-02-07 08:42:38
Message-ID: 389E857E.E96862AB@bitmead.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Don Baccus wrote:

> It's not ALL that bad, my earlier comments were
> partly tongue in cheek.

<grumble> I think they're pretty bad. I did start reading from the
beginning, even reading the definitions and there are many things that
are not clear to me.

If you think it's not too bad, do you care to comment on the "ONLY"
situation?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vince Vielhaber 2000-02-07 12:12:37 New Globe
Previous Message Chris 2000-02-07 08:31:14 Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT and ORDER BY bug?