From: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Spoke too soon (was RE: cvs committers digest) |
Date: | 2000-02-05 22:12:16 |
Message-ID: | 389CA040.D5CBC94F@wgcr.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Lamar Owen wrote, in a misguided moment: (:-/)
> I also track the current CVS -- but for a totally different reason, as I
> want to be able to release RPMs of the beta release the same day as the
> beta release -- thus, I am doing trial builds of RPM's against the CVS.
> However, this current issue doesn't impact me in the slightest -- which
> is why I have not and will not say anything about it.
I am now saying something about it. While I have been doing trial
builds of the current sources, I have not been building all the clients
up until today, for speed in building. And guess what -- the lack of
pqbool breaks the perl5 client. Badly. Won't-even-compile-badly.
Is this breakage going to be fixed by the 15th? If not, what can I do
to workaround it until it is fixed properly (either by putting pqbool
back in libpq-fe.h, or by fixing Pg.xs to not need pqbool).
I _would_ like to have RPM's ready of the beta on the release day....
TIA
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-02-05 22:26:06 | Re: [HACKERS] Spoke too soon (was RE: cvs committers digest) |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-02-05 22:01:59 | Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for new SET variables for optimizer costs |