From: | Chris <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-sql(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2000-02-03 13:05:32 |
Message-ID: | 38997D1C.9F353FED@bitmead.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Oops:
> test=> drop index i_test;
> DROP
> test=> select relhasindex from pg_class where relname = 'test';
> relhasindex
> -------------
> t
> (1 row)
>
> Let me add that to the TODO list.
Why not change that to a relnumindexes as well? Easier to maintain and
more useful information.
> > >Could you do that for relhassubclass?
> >
> > If we made it relnumsubclasses and incremented/decremented on
> > CREATE/DROP, it seems easy in theory.
>
> Yes, that would work. Seems hasindex has problems.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-02-03 13:26:05 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-02-03 12:37:42 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-02-03 13:26:05 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-02-03 12:37:42 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-02-03 13:26:05 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-02-03 12:37:42 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL |