Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: chris(at)bitmead(dot)com, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, pgsql-sql(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL
Date: 2000-02-03 10:10:47
Message-ID: 38995427.8F48CAA5@tm.ee
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
>
> Yikes. Strange. Can we just return nulls for the empty fields?

I think more natural way would be to define a new type (NAF - NotAFiled),
like we have NAN for floats (do we ?, at least IEEE has)

-----------------
Hannu

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2000-02-03 10:31:23 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2000-02-03 10:06:09 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2000-02-03 10:31:23 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2000-02-03 10:06:09 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2000-02-03 10:31:23 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2000-02-03 10:06:09 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL