Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
To: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, chris(at)bitmead(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-sql(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL
Date: 2000-02-03 10:00:20
Message-ID: 389951B4.51E74B47@tm.ee
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql

Don Baccus wrote:
>
>
> The reality, AFAIK, is that in the crucible of commercial use, real
> OO databases and thinking simply haven't penetrated.

AFAIK Informix integrated most OO features from Illustra into their UDB
and also latest versions of Oracle have moved a lot in that direction too.

> Nor is Postgres written in C++ :)

what does C++ have to do with OO ;)

----------------------
Hannu

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yury Don 2000-02-03 10:03:57 Re: [GENERAL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL
Previous Message Mark Alliban 2000-02-03 09:22:15 Re: [GENERAL] Re: Poor performance - need advice

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yury Don 2000-02-03 10:03:57 Re: [GENERAL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL
Previous Message Chris 2000-02-03 09:17:10 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yury Don 2000-02-03 10:03:57 Re: [GENERAL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL
Previous Message Chris 2000-02-03 09:17:10 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL