From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: How to shoot yourself in the foot: kill -9 postmaster |
Date: | 2001-03-06 03:10:18 |
Message-ID: | 3899.983848218@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Please note that the reason we're having this discussion at
>> all is that the init script may be used for purposes other than system
>> shutdown. So the argument that "it's going to happen anyway" is wrong.
> Believe it or not, you just disproved your own statement that the
> initscript should not take it upon itself to issue the kill -9.
How?
> So, what if I issue '/etc/rc.d/init.d/postgresql restart' -- and
> backends don't go away during the 'stop' phase, while postmaster may
> actually have died? Or is it even possible for postmaster to drop out
> with a running backend out there?
The postmaster will certainly not do so voluntarily. If you kill -9 it,
of course, that's the situation you're left with ... but your reasoning
seems circular to me. "I should kill -9 the postmaster to prevent the
situation where I've kill -9'd the postmaster."
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-03-06 03:11:56 | Re: How to shoot yourself in the foot: kill -9 postmaster |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-03-06 03:08:26 | Re: How to shoot yourself in the foot: kill -9 postmaster |