Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL

From: Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, chris(at)bitmead(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL
Date: 2000-02-03 03:57:12
Message-ID: 3898FC97.8EB813C6@nimrod.itg.telecom.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql

The Hermit Hacker wrote:

> Could this be implemented/patched in using #ifdef's, so that you could
> configure using --old-style-inheritance so that those that require it
> still have it, giving applications a chance to catch up?

Sounds like an excellent idea, although I'm not sure how to ifdef a .y
bison file.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-02-03 03:58:41 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Re: [GENERAL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL
Previous Message Chris Bitmead 2000-02-03 03:56:16 Re: [SQL] Re: [GENERAL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-02-03 03:58:41 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Re: [GENERAL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL
Previous Message Chris Bitmead 2000-02-03 03:56:16 Re: [SQL] Re: [GENERAL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-02-03 03:58:41 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Re: [GENERAL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL
Previous Message Chris Bitmead 2000-02-03 03:56:16 Re: [SQL] Re: [GENERAL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL