| From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Karel Zak - Zakkr <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] commit TO_CHAR() |
| Date: | 2000-01-27 05:20:47 |
| Message-ID: | 388FD5AF.1E335456@alumni.caltech.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > Couldn't this be reduced to functions for timestamp, int4, int8, float8,
> > and numeric?
> With datetime/timestamp I not sure, exapmle date_part() exist for both.
> And how is it with year in timestamp?
Once we condense the number of date/time types, we can strip a few of
these functions. Thanks for doing a complete set though; much better
than not having enough!
- Thomas
--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2000-01-27 05:28:00 | Re: [HACKERS] SQL 92 |
| Previous Message | Henry B. Hotz | 2000-01-27 02:09:14 | Re: OIDS (Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns) |