From: | Joseph Shraibman <jks(at)p1(dot)selectacast(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Fwd: Re: [INTERFACES] psql ERROR : Character Types Tuple is too big: size xxxxx |
Date: | 2000-01-27 03:21:57 |
Message-ID: | 388FB9D5.2B97A155@selectacast.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Compte utilisateur Sultan-advl <webmaster(at)advl(dot)org> writes:
> > [ tuple definition is bigger than 8K ]
> > BUT why psql does not raise an error in 'create table' ?
> > Maybe documentation needs more informations on this ? (In Data types)
>
> Well, actually, we are more interested in getting rid of the limitation
> than in adding more code that depends on it... there may even be a fix
> in 7.0...
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ************
I found this in the hackers mailing list archive:
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> at Technische
Universitaet Muenchen, Germany
Can I ask how our big open items for 7.0 are doing:
Long tuples/TOAST(Jan)
Foriegn keys/action buffer(Jan)
Unify date/time types(Thomas)
Outer Joins(Thomas)
I am only asking to know if we should continue with the planned Feb 1
beta?
====================END CLIP.
The problem is that none of the followups mentioned long tuples, so that
might have slipped through the cracks.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Byron Nikolaidis | 2000-01-27 04:23:17 | Re: [INTERFACES] SQLStatistics problem |
Previous Message | Joseph Shraibman | 2000-01-27 03:02:37 | Re: [INTERFACES] Servlets and JDBC driver: Access Exception |