From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Doc updates for index cost estimator change |
Date: | 2000-01-25 01:57:53 |
Message-ID: | 388D0321.D0A08D43@alumni.caltech.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > The primary graphics files should be .cgm files, but I see that we
> > only have those for one or two cases. The .ag files are Applix
> > Graphics files, which I use to embed the stuff into hardcopy.
> > I'll see about updating them, and committing a .cgm version of each.
> If the .ag files are derived files, meseems they should not be in
> the CVS tree at all?
Easy for you to say, you're not formatting the hardcopy :)
Seriously, I'm not certain that we can use .cgm format as a lossless
way for me to get figures into the hardcopy. But it seems like it
should work; my recollection is that Hannu helped test out formats
with me and we settled on .cgm as the most likely to succeed.
As soon as we have a complete set of .cgm files, and as soon as I've
tried generating hardcopy and jpegs or gifs for the .html, then we can
deep-six the .ag versions. In the meantime, it makes it easier on me
if we keep carrying those files in cvs.
- Thomas
--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2000-01-25 01:58:43 | RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-01-25 01:50:15 | DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace |