From: | Dang Minh Huong <kakalot49(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Johnston <polobo(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Equivalent syntax of PL/SQL using array in PL/pgSQL |
Date: | 2013-11-14 15:59:06 |
Message-ID: | 38896F17-30F1-48D8-B82B-386A0E5EAE99@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi,
2013/11/15 0:43、David Johnston <polobo(at)yahoo(dot)com> のメッセージ:
> bocap wrote
>>>> (rec[1]).t1 := 1;
>
> You need to stay one-level higher and re-build the entire typ entry then
> assign it back to the array at the same position.
>
> rec[1] = (1, rec[1].t2)::typ;
>
Thanks. I think, i can solve it with this way.
> David J.
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Equivalent-syntax-of-PL-SQL-using-array-in-PL-pgSQL-tp5778355p5778364.html
> Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Regards,
Huong,
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Elliot | 2013-11-14 16:04:03 | Re: Equivalent syntax of PL/SQL using array in PL/pgSQL |
Previous Message | Dang Minh Huong | 2013-11-14 15:56:08 | Re: Equivalent syntax of PL/SQL using array in PL/pgSQL |