Re: Status on 7.0

From: Jan Wieck <wieck(at)debis(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Jan Wieck <jwieck(at)debis(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Status on 7.0
Date: 2000-01-21 08:39:03
Message-ID: 38881B27.482D8D97@debis.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Can I ask how our big open items for 7.0 are doing:
>
> Long tuples/TOAST(Jan)
> Foriegn keys/action buffer(Jan)
> Unify date/time types(Thomas)
> Outer Joins(Thomas)
>
> I am only asking to know if we should continue with the planned Feb 1
> beta?

I know now that I have to do all the missing FOREIGN KEY stuff
myself. And thats not the file buffering alone. We cannot ship
FOREIGN KEY if pg_dump cannot handle it.

Up to now, nothing I did for TOAST changed anything visible. So it
has to wait for FK.

Currently, I'm a little busy, so I don't expect TOAST for 7.0
anymore - sorry.

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#========================================= wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jose Soares 2000-01-21 08:56:21 ODBC drive strange behavior
Previous Message Michael Robinson 2000-01-21 08:39:00 Re: [HACKERS] timezone problem?