Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed

From: Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>, Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, xun(at)cs(dot)ucsb(dot)edu, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed
Date: 2000-01-14 03:43:41
Message-ID: 387E9B6C.DE291D54@mascari.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Oracle tables and indices within a single tablespace all live in
> > one file (if you're using filesystem rather than raw I/O), so
> > they also provide features which allow you to specify how big
> > a chunk to allocate per extent (Oracle pre-allocates to avoid
> > running out of disk space while you're running except in ways
> > that you control, and in hopes of getting contiguous chunks of
> > disk storage because they hope you're using previously empty
> > disks used only for Oracle).
>
> And with data and index in the same file, you can't split them across
> spindles.
>

But you can certainly do that in ORACLE, if you wish. In fact,
ORACLE recommends it:

Place Data Files for Maximum Performance

Tablespace location is determined by the physical location of the
data files that constitute that tablespace. Use the hardware
resources of your computer appropriately.

For example, if several disk drives are available to store the
database, it might be helpful to store table data in a tablespace
on one disk drive, and index data in a tablespace on another disk
drive. This way, when users query table information, both disk
drives can work simultaneously, retrieving table and index data
at the same time.

Mike Mascari

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-01-14 04:21:23 Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-01-14 03:18:14 Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed