Re: [GENERAL] Simulating an outer join

From: Julian Scarfe <jscarfe(at)callnetuk(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Simulating an outer join
Date: 2000-01-12 23:16:11
Message-ID: 387D0B3B.7D7F3AD8@callnetuk.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > I have been thinking about how to simulate an outer join. It seems the
> > best way is to do:
> >
> > SELECT tab1.col1, tab2.col3
> > FROM tab1, tab2
> > WHERE tab1.col1 = tab2.col2
> > UNION ALL
> > SELECT tab1.col1, NULL
> > FROM tab1
> > WHERE tab1.col1 NOT IN (SELECT tab2.col2 FROM tab2)
> >
> > Comments? I know someone was asking about this recently.

Mike Mascari wrote:
>
> I wouldn't use IN ;-)
>
> SELECT table1.key, table2.value
> FROM table1, table2
> WHERE table1.key = table2.key
> UNION ALL
> SELECT table1.key, NULL
> FROM table1 WHERE NOT EXISTS
> (SELECT table2.key FROM table2 WHERE table1.key = table2.key);

FWIW, that's exactly Joe Celko's SQL-89 workaround for OUTER JOINs in 'SQL for
Smarties'. Well in fact he uses (SELECT * FROM table2 WHERE table1.key =
table2.key) as the subquery, but I presume that's an insignificant difference.

Julian Scarfe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-01-12 23:29:50 Re: [GENERAL] identifying performance hits: how to ???
Previous Message Julian Scarfe 2000-01-12 23:04:19 Making points into paths