| From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Identity columns should own only one sequence |
| Date: | 2019-04-29 16:28:39 |
| Message-ID: | 3875606fd9fa6b2d0239f4fb6c3a43378b283b37.camel@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 2019-04-27 at 14:16 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2019-04-26 15:37, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > What do you think of the patch I just posted on this thread to
> > remove ownership automatically when the default is dropped, as Michael
> > suggested? I think that would make things much more intuitive from
> > the user's perspective.
>
> I think that adds more nonstandard behavior on top of an already
> confusing and obsolescent feature, so I can't get too excited about it.
>
> A more forward-looking fix would be your other idea of having
> getOwnedSequence() only deal with identity sequences (not serial
> sequences). See attached patch for a draft.
That looks good to me.
I agree that slapping on black magic that appropriates a pre-existing
owned sequence seems out of proportion.
I still think thatthat there is merit to Michael's idea of removing
sequence "ownership" (which is just a dependency) when the DEFAULT
on the column is dropped, but this approach is possibly cleaner.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2019-04-29 16:35:11 | Re: Race conditions with checkpointer and shutdown |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2019-04-29 15:23:13 | Re: Race conditions with checkpointer and shutdown |