From: | Jan Wieck <wieck(at)debis(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | a(dot)joubert(at)albourne(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption |
Date: | 2000-01-05 14:34:14 |
Message-ID: | 38735666.AB28504B@debis.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
> > [mailto:owner-pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org]On Behalf Of Jan Wieck
>
> > Thus, IMHO there should be another command added to the
> > bootstrap parser. This would recreate ALL existing indices
> > (system and user ones), but tell the visibility code somehow
> > to ignore deleted tuples. I don't have the time to do it now,
> > so at least I'd like to have a TODO item for it.
> >
>
> I may be able to implement reindex command unless you have
> the time to do it.
>
> Different from your suggestion,I would implement it in a non-bootstrap
> standalone postgres with the new option by which PostgreSQL ignores
> system indexes.
Sounds good to me.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#========================================= wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ivo Simicevic | 2000-01-05 15:04:20 | Re: [INTERFACES] ECPG and FETCH |
Previous Message | Oliver Elphick | 2000-01-05 13:55:47 | Re: [HACKERS] ordinal decimal number |