Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption

From: Jan Wieck <wieck(at)debis(dot)com>
To: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: a(dot)joubert(at)albourne(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption
Date: 2000-01-05 14:34:14
Message-ID: 38735666.AB28504B@debis.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hiroshi Inoue wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
> > [mailto:owner-pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org]On Behalf Of Jan Wieck
>
> > Thus, IMHO there should be another command added to the
> > bootstrap parser. This would recreate ALL existing indices
> > (system and user ones), but tell the visibility code somehow
> > to ignore deleted tuples. I don't have the time to do it now,
> > so at least I'd like to have a TODO item for it.
> >
>
> I may be able to implement reindex command unless you have
> the time to do it.
>
> Different from your suggestion,I would implement it in a non-bootstrap
> standalone postgres with the new option by which PostgreSQL ignores
> system indexes.

Sounds good to me.

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#========================================= wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ivo Simicevic 2000-01-05 15:04:20 Re: [INTERFACES] ECPG and FETCH
Previous Message Oliver Elphick 2000-01-05 13:55:47 Re: [HACKERS] ordinal decimal number