Re: Is DATEDEBUG useful

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is DATEDEBUG useful
Date: 2000-01-03 07:41:49
Message-ID: 387052BD.C9B673D5@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I have removed the DATEDEBUG code. I can easily re-add it. Is there
> any use to keeping the code? The code looks clearer without it.

?? Only useful when debugging date/time code ;)

Leave it out; the code seems to be pretty stable and shouldn't break
much when doing the "date/time reunification" sometime soon.

- Thomas

--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-01-03 07:46:29 Re: [HACKERS] Docs
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-01-03 07:26:13 Re: [PORTS] RPMS on PostgreSQL.org updated.