| From: | Adriaan Joubert <a(dot)joubert(at)albourne(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | john huttley <john(at)mwk(dot)co(dot)nz> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 1999-12-27 12:12:22 |
| Message-ID: | 386757A6.E36B1499@albourne.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
john huttley wrote:
> > I believe we are adding Oracle compatibility as possible. We are
> > working on write-ahead log, long tuples, foreign keys, and outer joins.
> > Anything else?
>
> Yes, earlier in the year I was trying to migrate from Pervasive SQL to
> posgtres and
> came to a screaming halt when it wouldn't do a large view. Exceeded some
> sort of internal buffer
> or rule area. I dont recall the details, although the mail archive will have
> it.
This will be fixed by Jan's new compressed type and the long fields in a second
table. So in about 6 months time.
The one we still need is views on UNION's...
Adriaan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adam Szeliga | 1999-12-27 12:59:33 | The process ID of the backend ? |
| Previous Message | Karel Zak - Zakkr | 1999-12-27 11:46:17 | Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL |