From: | "James B(dot) Byrne" <byrnejb(at)harte-lyne(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: INSERT or UPDATE |
Date: | 2009-04-06 21:05:49 |
Message-ID: | 38641.216.185.71.24.1239051949.squirrel@webmail.harte-lyne.ca |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, April 6, 2009 17:00, Dann Corbit wrote:
.
>
> It is a difficult question.
>
> For instance, there are many possibilities when a collision occurs.
>
> I guess that for some collisions, sharing the name is OK.
>
I failed to explicitly state what the PK looked like.
entity_id(entities.id) +
identifier_type ('AKNA') +
identifier_value(entities.common_name)
There will only be a PK collision when we attempt to add a duplicate
common name for the same entity, which means it already exists and
does not need to be added again.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB(at)Harte-Lyne(dot)ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dann Corbit | 2009-04-06 21:15:58 | Re: INSERT or UPDATE |
Previous Message | Dann Corbit | 2009-04-06 21:00:03 | Re: INSERT or UPDATE |