From: | Jeff Hoffmann <jeff(at)propertykey(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ed Loehr <ELOEHR(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] server hardware recommendations (the archives aredead) |
Date: | 1999-12-15 20:16:42 |
Message-ID: | 3857F72A.C95FD63F@propertykey.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Ed Loehr wrote:
> Jeff Hoffman wrote:
>
> > ...i have seen several places which told me
> > that software raid under linux _isn't_ safe for multiprocessors & no
> > place has told me for sure that it is.
>
> Would you mind clarifying your understanding on which versions of linux are unsafe
> for software raid and how? Browsing deja, RH 6.1 (2.2.12-20smp) reportedly handles
> software raid without known problems (other than less than glowing documentation
> reviews), and I'm setting up pgsql/apache on such a system with software raid (no
> clear showstopping problems yet).
i'm not running RH6.1, but i am using a 2.2.12 kernel (compiled myself)
and like i said, no catastrophic problems. the problems, i believe,
came up with a conversation about an earlier 2.2 version of the kernel
and it may have included problems with adaptec SCSI controllers in
conjunction with software raid on SMP systems. i don't remember where i
found the references, though. i believe the adaptec 7880 driver was
fixed by 2.2.10, and there were a bunch of SMP fixes between 2.2.6 -
2.2.10, so 2.2.12 is probably as safe as anything. you never hear about
things that work, just about things that don't.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mike Mascari | 1999-12-15 20:49:50 | Re: [GENERAL] server hardware recommendations (the archives aredead) |
Previous Message | Karel Zak - Zakkr | 1999-12-15 20:06:23 | Re: [GENERAL] Czech2ASCII with --mb=Latin2 |