Re: With what options RPM was compiled? ( Was: Czech Win1250 sorting q)

From: Robert <robert(at)robert(dot)cz>
To: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: With what options RPM was compiled? ( Was: Czech Win1250 sorting q)
Date: 1999-12-14 15:57:48
Message-ID: 385668FC.298231E6@robert.cz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Thanks for everybody's help, I got it working now. An observation:
The steps Lamar described really created a binary RPM, however
the pg_encoding utility isn't included (it was built though). Similarly
'createdb -E LATIN2 xx' from README.mb doesn't work, while
create database with encoding = 'latin2' works OK.

- Robert

PS If anybody's is in urgent need, I can put those rpms online before
Lamar builts the new version with multibyte support enabled - just let
me know you're interested.

Lamar Owen wrote:

> Robert wrote:
> >
> > I've upgraded to 6.5.3 from RPM but 'set client_encoding' still says
> > 'unknow variable'. How can I know whether RPM was compiled
> > with --enable-locale and --with-mb=LATIN2? And if it wasn't,
> > could I humbly suggest it for next version?
>
> The default 6.5.3-2 RPM's are compiled with --enable-locale, but not
> with --with-mb=LATIN2.
>
> (NOTE: The following procedure tells how to rebuild the RPM set. Before
> doing so, make sure you have a full development system -- C and C++
> compilers, Tcl/Tk (and by extension X11), python-devel, perl, and the
> latest rpm (rpm-3.0.2 or 3.0.3).)
> ...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steven Saner 1999-12-14 16:05:55 pg_psort files
Previous Message Brian Haney 1999-12-14 15:25:58 RE: [GENERAL] Problem in pg_hba.conf