| From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jan Wieck <wieck(at)debis(dot)com> |
| Cc: | peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net, pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Last thoughts about LONG |
| Date: | 1999-12-11 19:22:29 |
| Message-ID: | 3852A475.2361E57B@tm.ee |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jan Wieck wrote:
>
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> > Please don't forget, this would require changes to pg_dump and psql. Also,
> > the COPY command might not be able to get away without changes, either.
>
> Oh yes, thanks. That was a point I forgot!
>
> Psql must not list tables that begin with "_LONG" on the \d
> request. Anything else should IMHO be transparent.
>
If this is the main concern then start them with "pg_L_" and they will be
ignored by the current implementation as well.
But of corse they will surface ad \dS , which may or may not be a good thing
as it makes it possible to list them without changing psql.
-----------
Hannu
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 1999-12-11 19:29:15 | Re: [HACKERS] Last thoughts about LONG |
| Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1999-12-11 19:06:25 | Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release |