UNICODE characters vs. BINARY

From: Gunther Schadow <gunther(at)aurora(dot)rg(dot)iupui(dot)edu>
To: "hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: UNICODE characters vs. BINARY
Date: 1999-12-11 17:33:10
Message-ID: 38528AD6.B186C0B7@aurora.rg.iupui.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

it seems to me that it's not quite clear whether pgsql makes
a consistent difference between byte and char, and if so, if
there is any way to store a small-sized array of bytes without
going right to a BLOB. If you interface pgsql with Java/JDBC
the support of UNICODE (16 bit per char) is quite essential to
avoid surprises.

A related question is whether we could support some more
standard names for data types (e.g., BIGINT, SMALLINT, etc.)
But I'm not sure there is really any standard. I would be
willing to work a little on these data types but I'd need
someone to hint me on who else is doing stuff and, if possible,
where to look first (and what known mistakes to avoid.)

regards
-Gunther

--
Gunther_Schadow-------------------------------http://aurora.rg.iupui.edu
Regenstrief Institute for Health Care
1050 Wishard Blvd., Indianapolis IN 46202, Phone: (317) 630 7960
schadow(at)aurora(dot)rg(dot)iupui(dot)edu------------------#include <usual/disclaimer>

Attachment Content-Type Size
gunther.vcf text/x-vcard 340 bytes

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-12-11 17:58:44 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump primary keys
Previous Message Jan Wieck 1999-12-11 17:04:04 Re: [HACKERS] LONG