From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Jan Wieck <wieck(at)debis(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] When is 7.0 going Beta? |
Date: | 1999-12-08 15:51:50 |
Message-ID: | 384E7E96.6BD702EF@alumni.caltech.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> From my point of view, we could start BETA for a 6.6.6 when I
> have the temp file buffered queue and the multibackend driver
> plus a test suite ready.
If y'all need some help to get the FK stuff farther along, a 6.6
release will help on that imho. It takes the immediate pressure off of
the other developers, and they can choose to continue with their
developments or to take a breather and help out the 6.6 release.
The fact that more work needs to be done on FKs etc to enable a 6.6
release is not fatal; that is an issue for every release on one topic
or another.
I haven't heard anything (yet) which would be a show stopper imho, and
I'd *really* like to decouple some of the changes coming up. In
particular, I could commit "join syntax" for 6.6, and then work on the
query tree redesign for 7.0...
- Thomas
--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 1999-12-08 15:57:19 | Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY and shift/reduce) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1999-12-08 15:49:35 | Re: [BUGS] uniqueness not always correct |