Re: AIX support

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Sriram RK <sriram(dot)rk(at)outlook(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: AIX support
Date: 2024-03-29 03:33:37
Message-ID: 3847604.1711683217@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Oh, sorry, I had missed the part where newer compilers fix the issue
> too. Old out-of-support versions of AIX running old compilers, what
> fun.

Indeed. One of the topics that needs investigation if you want to
pursue this is which AIX system and compiler versions still deserve
support, and which of the AIX hacks we had been carrying still need
to be there based on that analysis. For context, we've been pruning
support for extinct-in-the-wild OS versions pretty aggressively
over the past couple of years, and I'd expect to apply the same
standard to AIX.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2024-03-29 03:43:06 Re: DOCS: add helpful partitioning links
Previous Message Isaac Morland 2024-03-29 03:27:48 Re: PSQL Should \sv & \ev work with materialized views?