| From: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: InitPostgres and flatfiles question |
| Date: | 2007-01-06 03:40:28 |
| Message-ID: | 3845.24.211.165.134.1168054828.squirrel@www.dunslane.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>>>> What value is allowing multiple queies via PQexec()
>>>
>>> The only argument I can think of is that it allows applications to be
>>> sloppy about parsing a SQL script into individual commands before they
>>> send it. (I think initdb may be guilty of exactly that BTW...) At the
>>> same time you could argue that such sloppiness is inherently a Bad
>>> Idea.
initdb doesn't use libpq at all ... are you saying it should only pass
individual statements to the backend? Adding smarts to enable that would
add complexity without any benefit I can see.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-06 03:57:32 | Re: [HACKERS] wal_checksum = on (default) | off |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-06 03:21:25 | Re: A patch to pg_regress for Windows port |