From: | Adriaan Joubert <a(dot)joubert(at)albourne(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Postgresql <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type |
Date: | 1999-11-30 06:23:05 |
Message-ID: | 38436D49.16D5580F@albourne.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > I can integrate the type for you into the include/catalog files if
> > > everyone agrees they want it as a standard type and not an contrib type.
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Attached are the C-routines that implement a BIT and BIT VARYING type.
> > I know Bruce said he would integrate them, but he is writing a book at
> > the moment as well, so if somebody can explain to me how to go about
> > integrating it, or would like to have a go, go ahead.
>
> Applied. I am embarrassed to say I had a copy from June still in my
> mailbox.
Don't be: they've been ready for a while, but I had to recheck them.
When BIT and BIT VARYING are properly integrated, do I need to do
something about regression tests?
Adriaan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adriaan Joubert | 1999-11-30 06:30:42 | Re: [GENERAL] Table corruption and other questions |
Previous Message | Bradford Hovinen | 1999-11-30 04:49:16 | SQL error in PostgreSQL 6.5.3 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-11-30 06:33:48 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type |
Previous Message | Christof Petig | 1999-11-30 04:44:10 | Re: [HACKERS] CORBA STATUS |