From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Satoshi Nagayasu <nagayasus(at)nttdata(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] read-only database |
Date: | 2005-05-10 02:45:45 |
Message-ID: | 3842.1115693145@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> writes:
> The ability to have PGDATA in read-only media (like CDs) has been
> requested a lot of times, hasn't it?
It's come up a few times ... more than an un-overridable read-only mode
anyway. Also, I should think that those who want a secure read-only
mode want it enforced selectively --- for instance, assuredly read-only
for some users but not others. I can hardly see any use case for the
patch as proposed; it seems to have all the disadvantages of a low-level
read-only mode (eg, not selective) without any of the advantages.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-05-10 02:50:34 | Re: [HACKERS] read-only database |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-05-10 02:43:13 | Re: [HACKERS] read-only database |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-05-10 02:50:34 | Re: [HACKERS] read-only database |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-05-10 02:43:13 | Re: [HACKERS] read-only database |