Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I don't have trouble with 128, but other than standards compliance, I
> can't see many people getting >64 names.
One nice thing about 128 is you can basically forget about the weird
truncation behavior on generated sequence names for serial columns
--- "tablename_colname_seq" will be correct for essentially all
practical cases. At 64 you might still need to think about it.
regards, tom lane