From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz> |
Cc: | Vitalii Tymchyshyn <tivv00(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, Gavin Flower <gavinflower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: In progress INSERT wrecks plans on table |
Date: | 2013-05-10 13:30:58 |
Message-ID: | 3833.1368192658@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz> writes:
> Unfortunately a trigger will not really do the job - analyze ignores in
> progress rows (unless they were added by the current transaction), and
> then the changes made by analyze are not seen by any other sessions. So
> no changes to plans until the entire INSERT is complete and COMMIT
> happens (which could be a while - too long in our case).
I'm not sure I believe the thesis that plans won't change at all.
The planner will notice that the physical size of the table is growing.
That may not be enough, if the table-contents statistics are missing
or completely unreflective of reality, but it's something.
It is true that *already cached* plans won't change until after an
ANALYZE is done (the key point there being that ANALYZE sends out a
shared-inval message to force replanning of plans for the table).
Conceivably you could issue concurrent ANALYZEs occasionally while
the INSERT is running, not so much to update the stats --- because
they wouldn't --- as to force cached-plan invalidation.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2013-05-10 13:33:15 | Re: Concurrent HOT Update interference |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2013-05-10 13:28:24 | Re: Concurrent HOT Update interference |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2013-05-10 19:57:15 | Re: PostgreSQL planner |
Previous Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2013-05-10 12:51:20 | Re: In progress INSERT wrecks plans on table |