From: | Ng Pheng Siong <phengsiong(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | filesystem permissions and security |
Date: | 2005-10-31 18:02:34 |
Message-ID: | 3829471d0510311002u6c3a950axb744c95f97a11fc5@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Hi,
According to the manual from 7.3 onwards, PostgreSQL should be installed
thusly:
$ ./configure
$ gmake
$ su
# gmake install
# adduser postgres
# mkdir /usr/local/pgsql/data
# chown postgres /usr/local/pgsql/data
# su - postgres
$ /usr/local/pgsql/bin/initdb -D /usr/local/pgsql/data
<etc.>
I found a number of web pages which suggest the following:
# chown -R postgres /usr/local/pgsql
Which is obviously less secure. Dunno how those people got the idea; perhaps
from older versions' documentation?
Anyways, I'm trying to find out when the "new thinking" re filesystem
permissions came in being, and mailing list discussions on same, if any.
At my day job, I just came across Oracle installations which are "chown -R
oracle /usr/local/oracle". I'm told the vendor says to do it this way. Veni,
vidi, I couldn't believe my eyes and all that. :-)
In essence, I'm looking for "ammunition" to support my case to bring
Oracle's filesystem permissions to the higher standard set by modern
PostreSQL's.
TIA. Cheers.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Subbiah, Stalin | 2005-10-31 20:13:27 | Vacuum Verbose output |
Previous Message | Chris Browne | 2005-10-31 16:22:25 | Re: Scanners connected to the database |