| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Igor Neyman" <ineyman(at)perceptron(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: parallel option in pg_restore |
| Date: | 2010-06-22 17:10:16 |
| Message-ID: | 3824.1277226616@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
"Igor Neyman" <ineyman(at)perceptron(dot)com> writes:
> Attached are couple smallish files (I suspect, CM_200909.bac might have
> just empty tables, no data - but it still produces an errror).
Hmm. I get
pg_restore: [archiver (db)] Error while PROCESSING TOC:
pg_restore: [archiver (db)] Error from TOC entry 2741; 1259 30866 TABLE gp_cycle_200907 vec_dba
pg_restore: [archiver (db)] could not execute query: ERROR: relation "gp_cycle" does not exist
Command was:
CREATE TABLE gp_cycle_200907 (CONSTRAINT gp_cycle_200907_cycle_date_time_check CHECK (((cycle_date_time >= '2009-07-01 00:0...
The tables all seem to inherit from tables you omitted from the dump,
so of course it's not restorable for anyone else.
Now I do see
pg_restore: [custom archiver] dumping a specific TOC data block out of order is not supported without ID on this input stream (fseek required)
after that, but I'm wondering if this is just a problem in error
recovery rather than the bug we thought we were looking for.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-06-22 17:12:39 | Re: Unable to start Statistics Collector |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-06-22 16:57:36 | Re: blocking automatic vacuum |