Re: [GENERAL] 6.5 connection time: too slow (?)

From: Robert <robert(at)robert(dot)cz>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] 6.5 connection time: too slow (?)
Date: 1999-11-04 11:45:00
Message-ID: 382171BB.E9ED461@robert.cz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Very strange. Same postmaster flags? I can't imagine what it would be?
> We really have been improving performance, including startup
> performance.

The only difference I see is -i flag on the 6.5 postmaster, but removing it
doesn't change a thing, connecting is consistently 0.2934-0.2939 sec (only
other flag both server use is -S). To explain, I'm running simple test script
starting

use DBI;
use Data::Dumper;
use Time::HiRes qw/gettimeofday tv_interval/;

$start = [gettimeofday];
$db = DBI->connect("DBI:Pg:dbname=rfp") or die $DBI::errstr;
print "connect: ", tv_interval($start, [gettimeofday]), "\n";

Maybe both servers were compiled with different options, but I don't
know how to check with which ones. Any simple way how to find ou?
BTW, the exact results were

P2/233,PG6.5.2
connect 0.295
prepare 0.001
execute (select * from table)
60 rows/10 cols 0.153
15000 rows/4 cols 1.345
15000 rows/4 cols/LIMIT 30 0.044
15000 rows/4 cols/LIMIT 30 OFFSET 2000 0.050
fetch 30 0.002
finnish 0.000
disconnect 0.002

K6/166,pg6.4
connect 0.105
prepare 0.001
execute (select * from table)
60 rows/10 cols 0.162
15000 rows/4 cols 3.508 (finnish 0.091)
fetch 30 0.008
finnish 0.002
disconnect 0.001

It shows up to LIMIT/OFFSET brings 30fold speed up as expected (main reason
for upgrading, after all) and also that the same (bigger) select takes 1.345
vs. 3.508 sec
which corresponds reasonably well to the slower machine and older postgres.
Only
the connection time is a mystery.

- Robert

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephane FILLON 1999-11-04 14:24:08 RE: [GENERAL] plpgsql problem: relocation error
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 1999-11-04 09:40:21 Re: [GENERAL] indexed regex select optimisation missing?