Re: pgsql: Disk-based Hash Aggregation.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Davis <jdavis(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Disk-based Hash Aggregation.
Date: 2020-03-23 21:58:00
Message-ID: 3820.1585000680@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 02:05 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> If there's no way to test the feature in some significantly-cheaper
>> way,
>> perhaps we should move this test out to a separate script that's not
>> run
>> by default.

> I'll rework the tests. I wanted to be a bit more aggressive about
> testing right after the checkin to shake out any problems, but I don't
> think that's necessary any more.

Fair enough.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2020-03-23 21:59:29 pgsql: Fix ordering in typedefs.list
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2020-03-23 21:49:29 Re: pgsql: Disk-based Hash Aggregation.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2020-03-23 22:14:56 Re: Internal key management system
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-03-23 21:57:28 Re: Missing errcode() in ereport