From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: protect dll lib initialisation against any exception, for 8.5 |
Date: | 2009-04-01 23:57:17 |
Message-ID: | 382.1238630237@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> attached patch allows raising exception from _PG_init function as was
> discussed before.
I fooled around with this and came up with the attached improved
version, which allows reporting the full error status. However,
after thinking some more I feel that this is probably a cure worse
than the disease. If we simply leave the code as it stands, an
elog(ERROR) in an init function doesn't corrupt dfmgr.c's internal list,
which is what I had been fearing when I complained about the issue.
The worst that happens is that we leave the library loaded and leak
a little bit of memory. Unloading the library, as the patch does,
could easily make things worse not better. Consider the not-unlikely
case that the library installs itself in a few callback hooks and
then fails. If we unload the library, those hooks represent
*guaranteed* core dumps on next use. If we don't unload, the hook
functions might or might not work too well --- presumably not everything
they need has been initialized --- but it's hard to imagine an outcome
that's worse than a guaranteed core dump.
So I'm thinking this is really unnecessary and we should leave well
enough alone.
regards, tom lane
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
unknown_filename | text/plain | 2.4 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Steve Crawford | 2009-04-02 00:31:30 | Re: [HACKERS] string_to_array with empty input |
Previous Message | Richard Boulton | 2009-04-01 22:22:42 | Re: [Snowball-discuss] Snowball release cycle ? |