Re: Restoring normal master-slave roles after replication failure

From: "Gilberto Castillo" <gilberto(dot)castillo(at)etecsa(dot)cu>
To: "Alex Balashov" <abalashov(at)evaristesys(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Restoring normal master-slave roles after replication failure
Date: 2015-04-01 18:49:29
Message-ID: 38142.192.168.207.54.1427914169.squirrel@webmail.etecsa.cu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

>
> On 04/01/2015 02:40 PM, Gilberto Castillo wrote:
>
>> But if you want to do manuel, you define archive_command = "hot_stanby"
>> on
>> both nodes
>
> Are you implying that my hypothesis is correct, i.e. that we can play
> the WALs on the slave out in reverse onto the slave?

I say who pg_recovery defines whether the node is a slave or not

Saludos,
Gilberto Castillo
ETECSA, La Habana, Cuba

Attachment Content-Type Size
unknown_filename text/plain 179 bytes

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gilberto Castillo 2015-04-01 19:50:47 Re: Catalog permissions
Previous Message BRUNO CESAR BERNARDES 2015-04-01 18:44:21 Re: Catalog permissions