From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: SQL JSON compliance |
Date: | 2022-04-29 08:13:48 |
Message-ID: | 380d209e-fea4-0e2d-1820-5ab990f4a660@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 13.04.22 22:43, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Simon has just pointed out to me that as a result of recent commits, a
> number of things now should move from the unsupported table to the
> supported table in features.sgml. In particular, it looks to me like all
> of these should move:
This all looks correct to me. Please go ahead.
> T811 Basic SQL/JSON constructor functions
> T812 SQL/JSON: JSON_OBJECTAGG
> T813 SQL/JSON: JSON_ARRAYAGG with ORDER BY
> T814 Colon in JSON_OBJECT or JSON_OBJECTAGG
> T821 Basic SQL/JSON query operators
> T822 SQL/JSON: IS JSON WITH UNIQUE KEYS predicate
> T823 SQL/JSON: PASSING clause
> T824 JSON_TABLE: specific PLAN clause
> T825 SQL/JSON: ON EMPTY and ON ERROR clauses
> T826 General value expression in ON ERROR or ON EMPTY clauses
> T827 JSON_TABLE: sibling NESTED COLUMNS clauses
> T828 JSON_QUERY
> T829 JSON_QUERY: array wrapper options
> T830 Enforcing unique keys in SQL/JSON constructor functions
> T838 JSON_TABLE: PLAN DEFAULT clause
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Guo | 2022-04-29 08:35:59 | Re: Re: fix cost subqueryscan wrong parallel cost |
Previous Message | wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com | 2022-04-29 05:35:58 | RE: Logical replication timeout problem |