| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: new target for contrib/Makefile |
| Date: | 2004-09-29 22:04:56 |
| Message-ID: | 3807.1096495496@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> I've seen the following idea somewhere:
Looks like you used a variant of this in src/backend/Makefile.
> Then again, the original proposal doesn't sound so bad either.
Well, I'd like a more generic fix that we could apply everywhere,
because right now the Makefiles are not good about honoring -k,
and that irritates me at least a couple times a week ;-). As an
example, if you get a compile error in building the backend,
src/Makefile aborts after "$(MAKE) -C backend" returns, instead of
proceeding to build interfaces, bin, etc.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2004-09-29 22:20:35 | Clarification of the PL/Perl documents |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-09-29 21:55:32 | Re: new target for contrib/Makefile |