Re: [SQL] Questions about vacuum analyze

From: "Steven M(dot) Wheeler" <swheeler(at)sabre(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [SQL] Questions about vacuum analyze
Date: 1999-10-12 16:16:11
Message-ID: 38035ECB.A89A13E8@sabre.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Space taken up by entire DB: 6.7GB
Space available on filesystem: 9.2GB

Space taken by currnt table: 3.7GB
Space taken by currnt index: 2.5GB

Fluctuation of available space during a select distinct on the currnt table:
max: 9.2GB, min: 4.1GB

--
Steven Wheeler
Mid-Range UNIX Engineering
Sabre Inc.
(918) 292-4119

Tom Lane wrote:

> "Steven M. Wheeler" <swheeler(at)sabre(dot)com> writes:
> > I am now running into another problem. I need to do select distinct from the
> > currnt to get dates for maintenance activity (rows to summarize and move to
> > history). When ever I do I get this message in my server.log file:
>
> > NOTICE: BufFileRead: should have flushed after writing
>
> > And I get 0 records selected.
>
> After some code browsing I have come up with a theory: is it possible
> that you are running out of disk space during the sort? I see psort.c
> neglects to check for write failure :-(, although I am not entirely
> clear on why that particular message and nothing else would come out
> after it bulled ahead with an incomplete temporary file.
>
> Sorting a large table seems to require temp disk space equal to several
> times the size of the table. Since you said your table is 40M rows,
> I can easily believe you don't have that much free space...
>
> I don't believe anyone has taken a hard look at psort.c in a long time.
> I will try to dive into it and see if its resource consumption can't
> be reduced. Mergesort inherently requires 2X the original data space,
> but it seems that psort is using even more than that, and perhaps this
> can be improved.
>
> regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-10-12 18:07:28 Re: [SQL] Questions about vacuum analyze
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-10-12 15:17:40 Re: [SQL] Questions about vacuum analyze