Re: JSON Path and GIN Questions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
Cc: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Erik Wienhold <ewie(at)ewie(dot)name>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: JSON Path and GIN Questions
Date: 2023-09-15 21:14:45
Message-ID: 3802532.1694812485@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"David E. Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> writes:
> On Sep 14, 2023, at 00:41, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> As far as json in particular is concerned, 8.14.4 jsonb Indexing [4]
>> is pretty clear about what is or is not supported.

> How do you feel about this note, then?

I think it's unnecessary. If we did consider it necessary,
why wouldn't just about every subsection in chapter 8 need
similar wording?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yurii Rashkovskii 2023-09-15 21:25:38 Re: ALTER ROLE documentation improvement
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2023-09-15 20:53:01 Re: ALTER ROLE documentation improvement